英文摘要 |
Lakoff proposes an idea of New Enlightenment in his analysis of American political discourses, which reveals (1) how political ideas are framed in terms of family values and ideals of parent-child relationship, (2) different ways of the framing, and (3) the resultant diversity of cognitive models that define values people embrace and what counts as common sense in politics. New Enlightenment urges people to face squarely the cognitive diversity, and to reframe political discourses accordingly. Through a critical and cross-cultural analysis, I argue that reframing, as portrayed by Lakoff, is self-defeating, and propose that it should be modified and incorporated into a more inclusive civic dialogue that encourages listening and empathic understanding. |