英文摘要 |
This paper originates from an old puzzle of mine: why it was so difficult for Kuhn and his SSK/STS admirers or commentators to communicate smoothly with each other. Treating as a complicated web of intellectual history the documents of his students, enemies, interviews, or declarations, I trace through them and reevaluate their multiple channels. I question the validity of the following theses raised in recent years on Kuhn; that Kuhn is the father of STS, has a reverse Oedipus complex on STS younger scholars, exerted a very bad influence on STS, is a conservative in the Cold War era, and I also explain why Kuhn later considered his Structure not a sociology work. The results of this study are that among other forrunners of STS, Kuhn is an important but often misunderstood one, and that he considered himself genealogically as a close relative of but also a serious competitor with SSK/STS. My humble hope in this paper, during the 50th anniversary of publication of Structure, is to recover or to restore Kuhn in a more constructive and fruitful relationship with STS. |