牟宗三先生、其後學與海德格──邁向一新的基礎存有論之路

Mou Tsung-san, his Successors and Heidegger―The Way to a New Fundamental Ontology

本文主要探討中國哲學研究者如何援引海德格哲學詮釋中國哲學。首先說明牟宗三本人對於海德格哲學之評價。其次舉出牟先生弟子如袁保新與陳榮灼之研究為主要範例，檢討其如何吸收海德格哲學，並用以詮釋中哲。由於對於海德格哲學之態度不同，二人對於中國哲學一代開展者牟宗三先生的哲學也有不同評價。最後，透過海德格哲學中「物自身」概念之提出，進一步說明海德格與中哲匯通之可能。並提出發展一種新的基礎存有論之必要性。

In this paper I mainly discuss how Chinese scholars use Heideggerian philosophy in their interpretation of Chinese philosophy. First, I discuss Mou Zongsan's own appraisal of Heideggerian philosophy. Second, by using the studies by Chan Wing-Cheuk and Yuan Baoxin as models, I review how scholars adopt Heideggerian philosophy in interpreting Chinese philosophy. However, due to their different attitudes towards Heideggerian philosophy, they also show different opinions towards Mo Zongsan, the pioneer scholar in modern Chinese philosophy. I also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two post-Mou Zongsan models by Yuan Baoxin and Chan Wing-Cheuk. Lastly, through the introduction of the concept of “thing in itself” in Heideggerian philosophy, I further discuss the possibility for the confluence of the Heideggerian and Chinese philosophy, and also the necessity of building a new fundamental ontology.