以契約約定著作人格權不行使之爭議研究兼從憲法基本權利面向觀察

The Controversy over Making an Appointment on Not Exercising Moral Rights in Contract－Observing from the Aspect of Fundamental Rights of Constitution

以契約約定著作人格權之不行使，其憲法容許性如何？本文嘗試先從著作人格權與著作財產權之關係中，析論著作人格權之特性，並由著作人格權在歐陸、美國及明文訂定於伯恩公約後之發展，再談到我國現行之著作人格權制度，接著，探討著作人格權與一般人格權之差異，以明二者之保護強度關係，而對於得否以契約約定著作人格權之不行使的課題，實務上雖向來採取肯定說，惟學說上則出現有肯定說、否定說及區分說等爭議，本文認為從憲法基本權利的角度來觀察該問題，會有較寬廣的視野，因之，以契約約定著作人格權之不行使憲法容許性問題，可能同時涉及著作權人之著作人格權及交易相對人之契約自由，援引德國基本權第三人效力理論，國家自需介入作價值之衡量，並解決上開出現之基本權衝突的問題，最後針對肯定說、否定說及區分說分別探討，並提出作者淺見，期能對該課題有一較清楚之認識及妥適之解決。

This study attempted to discuss the permissibility of making an appointment on not exercising moral rights in contract. To begin with, the relationship between moral rights and economic rights were analyzed, followed by a comprehensive exploration of the development of moral rights in the Continent, United States of America, Taiwan, and as well as in Bern Convention. The diverseness of moral rights and personality were next talked over, with a discussion on the permissibility of making an appointment on not exercising moral rights in contract being put forth. Regarding the issue, some take a positive stance, others hold a negative view, and still others advocate distinguishing it. In an effort to balance the three different ways of thinking, the present study observed this issue from the aspect of fundamental rights of constitution, related both the moral rights of author and freedom to contract of the opposite side, and should be served as a preliminary probe into relevant subjects.