英文摘要 |
This research aims to hold a considerably debate on the Holding Companies’ intellectual capital. By ways of reviewing relevant intellectual capital written works, and of interviewing with a few of the members in National Finance Comptroller Bureau, we developed fifty-eight measuring indicators. Which are attributed to three constructional catalogues, such as “manpower capital”, “constructional capital” and “coordinative coherency capital”. By using method of factor analysis, the following key factors of intellectual capital are acquired : the “manpower capital” is extracted with four factors, which are as “working capability”, “professional expertise”, “work coherency”, and “personal educated degree” ; the “constructional capital” is extracted with four factors, which are as “auditing efficiency”, “innovation and knowledge management”, “auditing techniques”, and “informational condition” ; as for the “coordinative coherency” is extracted with two factors, which are “internal coordination and cooperation” and “interacting with external environment”. Except for above, other findings are based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which shows the importance of “professional expertise” and “working capability” in manpower capital a few differential priority, the other key factors’ importance of priority in various capitals are the same as what the factor analysis method shows. This research reflects that “professional expertise” and “working capability” are two very important items of intellectual capital in military financial departments, the least important factors of intellectual capital are following with “interacting with external environment”, “personal educated degree” and “informational condition”. |