政府資訊公開與個人資料保護的界限──以電子傳輸地籍資料為核心

On the Limit between Government Information Disclosure and Personal Information Protection -- Focus on the Transmission of Digital Land Administration

開放資料為近年許多國家重視的議題，在政府資訊公開的思維本來也相當值得鼓勵；然而，其所衍生而來的巨量資料對社會上的經濟發展、人民的生活有著顯著的影響卻也不容小覷。究竟現階段的法律規範是否足以解決此等對人民權利帶來的影響？又如法規範無法解決此等問題，則立法論上又應如何進行因應？都是現階段必須面對的問題。本文以地籍資料的電子傳輸為例，透過文獻的整理及分析，發現現行個人資料保護法只能部份解決此等問題，而開放資料思潮所帶來的大部分問題卻無法透過個人資料保護法來解決。本此，本文認為應回頭探尋個人資料保護法的核心精神，重新認識人格權及人性尊嚴的保障，正視資料多元化及資料申請人多樣化的特色，進行類型化並本諸人格權及人性尊嚴保障的意旨來得出個別的答案，據以訂定符合巨量資料及開放資料需求，又能妥適保障人民權利的法律規範。

The issue of “Open Data” is be regarded by many countries inrecent years, the thinking of government information disclosurealso be encourage by contemporary administrative theories.However, when we exercise this value will produce many datarelate to people’s live and economic development in our society, atthe same time, this development also affect people’s right ofConstitution, and we cannot ignore this situation. Can legal systemsolve these problems? If legal system cannot solve these problems,how do we design our institution in legislation? All of thesequestions are we need to address in present. This article will take anexample with land administrative information, and find thePersonal Information Protection Law only can solve a part ofproblem through literature collation and analyze. More important,the majority issues bring by “Big Data”, “Open Government” or“Open Data” cannot solved with Personal Information ProtectionLaw. Therefore, this article conclude we should re-find core spiritsof Personal Information Protection Law, and understand theprotection of human dignity and personality right in Constitution again. Then, we need pay attention to the diversification ofinformation and information applicants, and classify different type.Finally, we could find each answer in different situation based onthe analysis above, and make rules conform to the requirement ofthe development of “Open Data” and “Big Data”. In addition, theserules can protect fundamental right in Taiwan’s legal structure.