《莊子》論墨述評

Analysis of 'Zhuangzi' Comments Mozi's Doctrine

墨家學派號曰「顯學」，是戰國時期的學術主流之一。於諸子鼎沸、處士橫議的時代氛圍，各家學派蠭出並作，論道陳義相互趨舍不同。墨子亟欲救世之弊而提出「兼愛」、「非樂」及「節葬」等理念作為對治方策，《莊子》則分別以「无私焉，乃私也」、「不與先王同，毀古之禮樂」、「死無服」批評之。本文即針對此進行述評，以釐清《莊子》論墨是否公允。其次，除了《墨子》本書之外，記載墨家學派的文獻猶如鳳毛麟角，對於後人認識墨子之後墨家學派的發展面貌，《莊子．天下》一文的「墨經」、「別墨」及「巨子」等敘述則透露出甚為重要的線索，本文亦予以論析之。

In the warring states period, the school of Mozi’s philosophy was considered very influential. In an era of fierce competition in the school, different doctrine of mutual interest. Mozi in order to save the ills of society and the ”Universal love”, ”Anti-music” and ”Frugal funeral” philosophy, Zhuangzi has expressed criticism on these ideas. This is for comments on this in order to clarify the comments of the Zhuangzi is fair. Secondly, in addition to the book Mozi, records of Mohist literature is scarce, awareness for future generations of Mohist's development landscape, Tianxiapian by Zhuangzi of ”Mohist Canons”,” Biemo”and ”Gizi” narration reveals very important clues, this article will be on the analysis.