論辭章之無法與有法－－以客觀存在與科學研究作對應考察

Rules or No Rules in Literary Works-An Exploration of Objective Existence and Scientific Research

「無法」與「有法」是天人互動的關係。其中「無法」，相當於「無極」，指宇宙規律與條理的本身，為核心的「客觀存在」；而「有法」相當於「太極生兩儀…」，指宇宙規律與條理之層層運作，是可以靠「科學研究」加以驗證的。如落於「辭章」此一領域而言，這個「法」，以作家來說，通常是「不知亦能行」的，為「直觀表現」；以辭章研究者來說，便要引作家們「直觀表現」的成果為對象，用科學的方法，找出通貫「你、我、他」的共同點，作「模式定位」，以解釋「有法（文成法立）」，並歸根於「無法（文無定法）」來確認其「源頭活水」。經此探討，「無法」（客觀存在）與「有法」（科學研究）互動的梗概，便可辨明。

There is an interactive relation between man and nature ”by rules or no rules”. The universal regularity is an objective existence ”by no rules”, which is equivalent to ”infinity”. The Grand Terminus that produced the two elementary Forms, on the other hand, develops a systematic operation of the universal regularity ”by rules”. Rules can be verified by scientific research. In terms of literary works, the ”rule” of writing is an intuitive representation that is workable to the writer unknowingly. From a researcher's point of view, he studies the achievement of the writer's intuitive representation by means of scientific methods. He discovers the common ground among ”you, he, and I”; establishes the patterns of organization; and illustrates the rules (the organization is established upon the writing is finished). However, the organization of writing can not be constrained by any definite pattern (i.e. by no rules) in order to activate originality. This article explores the interactive context of objective existence (no rules) and scientific research (by rules).