替補賠償請求權之結構

The Structure of Claim for Substitute Damages

替補賠償請求權，乃以金錢賠償給付之損害賠償請求權。替補賠償請求權之內容，乃金錢債務與免除給付義務。財產上損害之計算方法，亦共同構成替補賠償請求權之內容。替補賠償請求權之結構，符合相應每項債務不履行法定類型。儘管如此，在現行民法秩序裡，若干替補賠償請求權，只是某債務不履行法定類型例外之法律效果，而非原則、固有之法律效果。違反保護義務，亦應以替補賠償請求權作為原則、固有之法律效果，而非僅限於完整利益損害賠償請求權；給付遲延亦應以替補賠償請求權作為原則、固有之法律效果，而非僅以其為例外之法律效果。現行法之解釋亦允許，不能補正之瑕疵，以大損害賠償請求權與小損害賠償請求權之選擇，作為其原則、固有之法律效果。

The claim for substitute compensation is the claim for money compensation instead of payment. The content of the claim for substitute compensation is money debt and exemption from an obligation. The calculation of property damage also constitutes the content of the claim for substitute compensation. The structure of the claim for substitute compensation is in accordance with the corresponding non-performance of each type of debt. Nevertheless, in the current civil order, a number of claims for substitute compensation are not principle, but only exceptional legal effect of some type of breach of contract. The claim for substitute compensation should be the legal effect of breach of protection obligations. The payment delay should also adapt the claim for substitute compensation as principle legal effect. The interpretation of the current civil law does also allow that the debtor generally can make chose between large and small compensation.