不予再審“管轄錯誤”後遺留問題研究

The Remaining Problems of Denying to Retry 'Jurisdictional Mistakes'

依現行法規定，當事人以“管轄錯誤”為由對管轄權異議裁定提出的再審申請，最高人民法院已不再審查。將“管轄錯誤”排除出裁定的再審範圍後，作為例外，仍有必要對關涉仲裁協議和外國法院管轄這兩類管轄權異議裁定進行再審。當事人以包括“管轄錯誤”在內的多項事由對生效判決申請再審時，如判決本身不存在錯誤，無需再對管轄問題進行審查，但判決本身存在錯誤時，仍有必要對管轄是否錯誤進行審查。

Since the enforcement of the 'Interpretation of PRC Civil Procedure Law', the PRC Supreme Court ceased to retry the verdicts over the motions challenging the 'jurisdictional mistakes'. However, although 'jurisdictional mistakes' were excluded from the scope of retrial matters, as an exception, it is still necessary for the court to retry the verdicts challenging 'jurisdictional mistakes' relating to arbitration agreements and foreign courts' jurisdiction. When a disputing party disagreed with the verdicts made by a court authorized by a provincial supreme court, he may appeal to the PRC Supreme Court. When a disputing party applies for a retrial against several matters including 'jurisdictional mistakes', the judge shall not review the 'jurisdictional mistakes' if the judgement itself is correct; only if the judgement itself is wrong, shall the judge review the 'jurisdictional mistakes'.