論菲中南海仲裁案

The Philippines v. China Arbitration on the South China Sea Disputes

2013年1月22日，菲律賓依據聯合國海洋法公約第15部分第287條與附件 7之規定，片面對中國啟動關於南海海洋管轄權爭端的強制仲裁程序。中國聲明拒絕接受及參與此一程序的情況下，仲裁庭在2015年10月29宣判對本案之管轄權成立，並於同年11月完成實質問題階段的開庭審理，預定2016年6月以前作出判決。菲律賓有計畫地設計對中國九段線及歷史性權利主張的法律戰，試圖瓦解中國的南海主張，對該主張的合法性帶來極大的壓力。本仲裁案對我國作為南海主張之一方的身分，以及太平島的島嶼地位，更帶來雙重的困境。本文建議，仲裁庭在審理《公約》第121條第3項解釋以及太平島地位時，應謹慎考量一些菲律賓沒有注意到，但卻相關的問題。有鑒於本仲裁案恐對我國有不利的影響，現階段政府、有必要繼續維持我國在太平島的存在，強化我國作為南海主張和利益當事者的論述，並設法爭取最大的戰略利益。

On January22 2013, Philippines unilaterally initiated compulsory arbitral procedure against China, in accordance with Part XV, Article287of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ) , concerning matters relating to their disputes over maritime jurisdiction in the outh China Sea. China formally declared its objection against the procedure and refused to participate. Notwithstanding this circumstance, the Arbitral Tribunal established its jurisdiction on October29 2015, and conducted hearings on merits in November. The award on merits is expected by June2016. The Philippines has conducted a “lawfare” against China by deliberately formulated its submissions in such ways that the legal bases and validity of China's Nine-dash Line and historic rights claims may be under serious threat. In addition, the arbitration has not only gravely undermined Taiwan's identity as a claimant to the South China Sea, but also caused uncertainty to Itu Aba's status as an “island”. These challenges could have a negative impact on Taiwan. It is suggested that the Tribunal should carefully consider relevant issues concerning the interpretation of Article121 (3) of UNCLOS and the legal status of Itu Aba, which have been omitted by the Philippines. Moreover, Taiwan should make sustained efforts in maintaining presence on the Itu Aba and advocating its identity as a claimant and stakeholder in the South China Sea, and try to maximize its strategic interests.