英文摘要 |
This paper examines the linkage between bank's political connection and operating risk, based on data of public banks on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) through 2006~2013. While existing literature has mentioned that firm's political connection has benefit versus cost, the number of existing studies examining political influence on the business risk based on banking industry is rare. Bank plays a significant role in the development and stability of the financial system, how bank's board political connection affects bank risk forms the fundamental motivation of this research. This paper constructs three indicators for board bank's political connection. For each bank, we hand-collect whether incumbent and outgoing cabinet member or officer, legislator and government officers are also a board member. The first is a dummy such that if there is at least one member fits above description, it is equal to one, and zero otherwise. The second is the number of board member fits above description. Third, the number of board member fits above description divided by total number of director of a bank. Greater value of all three measures indicates greater degree of bank's political connection. On the bank's risk, we employ capital adequacy ratio, the nonperforming loan ratio, liquidity ratio and Z-score as four proxy variables. Multiple regression result shows that bank with greater degree of political connection tends to have low capital adequacy ratio, higher nonperforming loan ratio and lower Z-score, means that bank's political connection deteriorates soundness on capital adequacy, asset quality and higher bankruptcy cost. The cost of hiring politicians on the bank board outweighs the benefit in terms of greater risk. Interesting, political connection with DDP largely explains the PC-risk nexus. |