英文摘要 |
It is shown in this paper that in Chinese sortal and mensural classifiers differ from one another in their semantic―not categorial―feature, both being listed as Cl in the lexicon and none undergoing the syntactic operation of N-to-Cl movement. In English, by contrast, the so-called measure words are categorized as N, and not Cl. This feature and non-movement analysis of classifiers may explain in a principled way the cross-linguistic variation in the mass-count property of duration expressions, on the one hand, and the cross-linguistic co-occurrence restriction between numerals and plural morphology, on the other. Such an account is also free of some empirical and typological problems raised for Cheng & Sybesma’s (1998, 1999) theory of Chinese classifiers and Li’s (1999) theory of Chinese plural morphology. |