英文摘要 |
Linguistic exploration of sign languages has been going on for nearly half a century. Yet, much remains to be learned about sign language structure and use. Although frequency effects have long been known to be important in functional approaches to linguistics, and exploration in this area is now gaining momentum in mainstream linguistics, questions of frequency effects have hardly been explored in sign languages. This work is a small step in the direction of filling that gap. Smith & Ting (1984) identify 56 handshapes in TSL. The null hypothesis predicts that all 56 ought to occur with equal frequency in TSL. I show, using a very small corpus, that this is not the case; in fact, some handshapes have a much greater token frequency than others. Why should this be? Knowing that any thorough answer will encompass competing factors, I appeal to the notion of ease of articulation and see how far it can go. Following Ann 1993 and 1996, I categorize handshapes into three groups: easy to articulate, hard to articulate and impossible to articulate, and show how logically possible handshapes, including attested TSL handshapes, fit into this paradigm. Then I show that the most frequently occurring handshapes tend to be the easiest to articulate, but that the least frequently occurring handshapes are not necessarily those that are hard to articulate. The results presented here are admittedly preliminary, but they serve to open the door to future investigation of frequency effects in TSL. |