英文摘要 |
This paper investigates three types of adjunct wh-phrases for asking reasons: (a) how come in English, (b) why the hell, and (c) what for asking reasons (found in a few languages). We demonstrate that they share several restrictions. First, they cannot establish a long-distance dependency. Second, they cannot occur in multiple wh-questions. Third, they cannot scopally interact with quantifiers. We develop a unified analysis of these adjunct wh-phrases, utilizing feature strength in the sense of Chomsky (1995: chapter 4) and the probe-goal system (see Chomsky 2000, 2001a, b). One consequence of the analysis is therefore that the concept of strength is not eliminable from the theory of grammar, contrary to Chomsky’s recent proposal. Our analysis also has implications for constructions such expletive constructions and wh-scope marking constructions. |