《漢學研究》歷史類論著引用文獻計量分析（2004－2009）

A Quantitative Analysis of Citations in History Articles Published in Chinese Studies between 2004 and 2009

《漢學研究》自1983年創刊迄今，已成為國內很重要的人文研究學報，亦為國際漢學界知名的學術期刊。本文係以引文分析的方法，針對《漢學研究》近六年（第22－27卷，2004－2009年）歷史類論著82篇之引用文獻4,293筆做計量分析，以一窺歷史學論文的引用習慣和特性，並進一步了解其研究概況與發展趨勢。研究結果顯示，《漢學研究》近六年刊登之歷史類論文，皆附有很多附註和引用文獻，其中以古籍所占比例最高，其次是專書。引用文獻以中文資料最多，中國大陸出版者居半。出版距今六至三十年的書刊被引用得最多，可見文獻老化速度十分緩慢。引用文獻主要集中於史學領域，雖參考利用的書刊種類相當廣泛分散，本文仍試圖找出最常被引用的期刊21種、圖書29種，和現代作者18位。至於自我引用，《漢學研究》期刊本身的自我引用並不明顯，而雖有近六成的論文有作者自我引用的現象，但引用筆數的比例很低。

First published in 1983, ”Chinese Studies” has become not only an important journal of the humanities locally, but also an internationally-renowned sinological periodical. This paper analyzes the citations used in the past 6 years (volumes 22-27, 2004-2009) of history articles published in ”Chinese Studies”. A quantitative analysis of the 4,293 different citations made in a total of 82 such articles offers an overall glimpse of the habits and features of citation use, and facilitates a better understanding of the content and development trends of research carried out in the field of history in recent years. The results of this study show that the history articles published in ”Chinese Studies” during this period feature extensive notes and citations, the largest number of which refer to ancient works, followed by recent books. Most citations refer to materials in Chinese, with half of these published in mainland China. Books published between 6 and 30 years ago are most frequently cited, indicating that materials are passing out of use very slowly. Cited materials mainly focus on the historical studies field, and although a wide range of books are used for reference, this research attempts to identify the 21 most cited periodicals, 29 most cited books, and 18 most cited modern authors. Authors' citations of their own works are not at all clear in ”Chinese Studies”, and although almost 60 percent of the works analyzed use self-citation, they represent a relatively low proportion of total citations.