仲景序文應係後人託作於孫思邈之後、王冰之前

The Preface of 'Shang Han Lun' Should Be Written by the Later Generation between Sun Semiao and Wang Ping

《傷寒論》條文筆風柔弱，序文卻激昂憤慨，語調不合。序文混淆外感與傳染性疫毒、序文不符格式、不避皇帝諱名、弄錯疫毒流行之時間、序文字義與條文有別、仲景之前無人寫序文置於卷首…等等因素推測仲景序文應非出於仲景。比對《千金要方》發現孫思邈序文所引用張仲景曰之段句與仲景序文多有雷同，即孫思邈之前，張仲景曰之段句確已存在，但是張仲景曰之段句並不等同張仲景之序文。《隋書》輯錄《梁有張仲景辨傷寒十卷》，得知梁武帝曾見過《傷寒論》。梁武帝父親名順之，避諱順字，故《傷寒論》原本之四「順」湯被改為四「逆」湯。宋本既無四「順」湯，然序文末段有作：終始「順」舊，兩者矛盾，推知此末段乃梁朝滅亡（560）之後所增衍。《新唐書》輯錄之《傷寒卒病論十卷》為宋臣採用之底本，故宋本序文有《傷寒卒病論》書名；康平本序文亦有此書名，得知康平本之母本與《傷寒卒病論十卷》曾有交會。但是《千金要方》序文並無此書名，又察《千金要方．傷寒卷》與《千金翼方．傷寒卷》皆無仲景序文，證實孫氏未見過仲景之序文，「傷寒卒病論」書名應出於孫思邈（682）之後、康平本東傳日本（806）之前。王冰《補注黃帝內經》（762）時，將《九卷》改名為《靈樞》，仲景序文既標有《九卷》之旁註，推知「傷寒卒病論」書名乃683-761年間後人新創。總結宋本序文應係某君於683年至761年間，抄襲《千金要方》孫氏之語與孫氏所引用張仲景曰段句等，託仲景之名偽作，再經宋臣等增衍而得。

The soft writing style of the main body of 'Shang Han Lun' was different from the passionate style of its preface. In addition to wrongly using the symbol of emperor, mistaking the time prediction of epidemic disease, the preface had a wrong format and confused exogenous diseases and infectious epidemic disease. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that the preface of 'Shang Han Lun' was not written by Chang Chung-ching.