月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
國立臺灣大學法學論叢 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
民意支持死刑的態度可改變嗎?
並列篇名
Can public opinion on death penalty be changed?
作者 周愫嫻
中文摘要
臺灣是一個嚴刑重罰的社會嗎?這種嚴刑重罰是否近年愈發強烈?2014年的中研院與廢死聯盟的民意調查報告結果,似乎支持這個結論,因為支持死刑的比例高達82%。然而,這種態度不可改變嗎?本文以2014年中研院與臺灣廢死聯盟收集的民意調查資料分析顯示,至少三種因素可以改變人們反對廢死的態度:第一,提供死刑相關知識與訊息,第二,提供各種不同的替代死刑的方案,第三,找到一群心中具有多重與死刑相關衝突價值觀的民眾,因為他們最容易因為環境與條件的改變而轉變心意。 至於改變的比例,第一種比較有限,約5%民眾會因增加訊息,改而支持廢死;第二種非常有效,約47%民眾會因有替代方案,改而支持廢死,尤其終身監禁不得假釋,且需工作賠償被害人的替代方案,更能使得63%民眾改而支持廢死;第三種則更為有效,因為人們對於死刑存廢的看法,經常處於矛盾價值選擇中。大部分的人在選擇對死刑應否廢除時,也常「三心二意」或心意未決,譬如:又支持個人主義,也支持集體主義;同時關心冤案,也擔心縱放;有高被害恐懼,又覺得社區很安全;既認為刑罰應該有矯治效果,也認為要有嚇阻與應報功能。本研究發現心中愈認知到這些矛盾價值的民眾,可改變性愈高。
英文摘要
Is Taiwan a punitive society? Or Taiwan has become more and more towards punitive? A survey conducted by Academia Sinica and the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty in 2014 showed that 82% of the public supported the death penalty in Taiwan. It seems to support that Taiwan is indeed a punitive society. However, the research question raised by this study is whether or not the strong public support on death penalty can be changed. This present study analyzed the same 2014 survey data and found that it is possible to change the public opinion on death penalty. There are at least three methods to do so. First, 5% of the public would change their attitudes to support abolishment if more information/knowledge is provided. Second, 47% of the public would change their attitudes to support abolishment if alternative punishments are offered. The most effective alternative punishment preferred is the life sentence without parole plus prison work to compensate the victims (63% ). Last, most of the public have an ambiguous attitude to death penalty, for example, they support both individualism and collectivism, concern with both innocent cases and criminals found not-guilty in courts, have higher fear of crime but feel safe in the community, and perceived both rehabilitation and deterrence/retribution as the purposes of punishment. Nevertheless, these people who face the most value conflicts are most likely to change their originally positive attitudes of death penalty to abolishment. This study has demonstrated that the public opinion on death penalty are not as firm or unchangble as the government or society claims.
起訖頁 553-588
關鍵詞 死刑民意死刑替代方案衝突價值Death Penaltypublic opinionalternative to death penaltyvalue conflict
刊名 國立臺灣大學法學論叢  
期數 201706 (46:2期)
出版單位 國立臺灣大學法律學系
該期刊-上一篇 內線交易罪保護法益的探索:以市場效率假設及資本資產定價模型為核心
該期刊-下一篇 新聞自由與記者的侵犯隱私行為:以業務上正當行為的解釋為中心
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄