論信賴保護原則與我國婚姻之保護

The Marital System and Trust protection

信賴保護原則乃是以一般法律原則被行政程序法第8 條明文化，但實際上來說，該原則不僅是行政法的原則，毋寧也是憲法所要保護之價值，而被大法官所確認。但在實際適用上由於該原則可能衝擊法安定性之要求，因此不得不慎重。其中關於婚姻制度的問題，一夫一妻為我國憲法所保障，且設有重婚之禁止規定。且已有司法院大法官釋字第362 號解釋以及552 號解釋調和重婚與信賴保護的關係。然而在該號解釋做成多年之後，並且民法親屬編業已依據該解釋相應修正後，仍有類似之案件產生，且該案件案發時間介於兩號解釋之間，則應如何適用各該闡釋的信賴保護原則，有其討論之必要。

An Exception of bigamy called unintended bigamy was created in accordance with the principal of reliance protection in the Interpretation No. 362 of the Grand Justice Meeting of the Judiciary, thus making the bigamous marriages legal and valid. Subsequently, although the Interpretation No. 552 of the Grand Justice Meeting of the Judiciary that was released on December 13, 2009 provided supplementary to comprehend the aforesaid No. 362 Interpretation, intended bigamy remains legal as valid marriages. The new Articles of Civil Codes on May 23, 2007 formalized the underlying spirits provided under both of the aforesaid Interpretations by enacting such spirits into written Laws. But is it only wat to Protection of Legitimate Expectation?