![華語文教學研究 華語文教學研究](../File/DC/Journal/916.jpg) |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。 【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】
|
篇名 |
華語車輛量詞之語意變異研究:以「輛、部、台」為例
|
並列篇名 |
Semantic Variation on Chinese Classifiers for Vehicles: A Case Study on liang(輛), bu(部)and tai(台) |
作者 |
黃榛萱 |
中文摘要 |
本文旨在探討華語車輛量詞「輛、部、台」間的語意變異,依屬性結構 (Pustejovsky, 1995)將詞意分為組成成份(Constitutive)、動作(Telic)、 外在形式(Formal)以及生產方式(Agentivity)等四類,經由Rbrul 羅吉 斯迴歸(logistic regression analysis)找出最佳的影響因子。主要的研究發 現如下:首先,「輛」較常使用於四輪以上及非個人使用目的之車輛類型。 其次,「部」的語意偏好突顯車輛之所有權以及外觀。至於「台」則傾向強 調車輛外觀和來源,同時常用來計算四輪以下之車輛。本研究說明了華語 車輛量詞「輛、部、台」的使用非任意,而是依循認知模式的選擇。 |
英文摘要 |
The present study explored the Chinese classifiers liang (輛), bu(部) and tai (台)for vehicles by using the Qualia structure (Pustejovsky 1995) as the major criterion. Four independent variables, including Constitutive, Formal, Telic, and Agentivity, are tested in the Rbrul program to account for the multiple cross-cutting and interesting factors that influence language usage. The major findings of the study are as follows. First, liang serves as the standard usage for vehicles, which favors vehicles with at least four wheels (Constitutive) and non-personal use (Telic). Second, bu is salient for its personal use for ownership (Telic) and tendency toward an external appearance description (Formal). Third, tai tends to emphasize a vehicle with its appearance (Formal), origin (Agentivity), and wheels that are less than four (Constitutive). The study demonstrated that the use of vehicle classifiers bu, liang, and tai is not arbitrary, but instead follows cognitive-based categories. |
起訖頁 |
001-020 |
關鍵詞 |
量詞、屬性結構、華語文教學、classifier、Qualia structure、Rbrul、Chinese pedagogy |
刊名 |
華語文教學研究 |
期數 |
201703 (14:1期) |
出版單位 |
世界華語文教育學會
|
該期刊-下一篇 |
從華語初學者的識字表現建立漢字難易度指數 |
|