英文摘要 |
In order to enable clinical doctors to accurately diagnose and treat diseases, the clinical medical technologists at laboratories have to continue to improve quality control ability to ensure the accuracy of test reports and reduce the uncertainty of measurement. Different from the quality control indicators for traditional measurement of uncertainty, this study applied industrial quality control process indicator, Cpk, to clinical biochemical laboratory, and performed the comparison on identification of quality control between it and traditional indicators such as CV; bias and TE. This study collected the quality control data of high and low concentrations of daily biochemical test items (including GLU, BUN, CRE, AST, ALT, NA, K) of a clinical laboratory in a metropolitan teaching hospital from January to December 2015. After the calculations, this study obtained the quality control process indicator, Cpk, for identification and interpretation. Moreover, this study also performed analysis and comparison between it and traditional indicators. The research results showed that, from January to November, deviation in Cpk indicator of NA, K, and CRE calculated using peer quality control values that could not be identified using multiple traditional indicators were discovered in the laboratory. This study performed ex post facto analysis to further find out the possible reasons for deviation. This study concluded that, compared with traditional quality control indicators, such as CV, bias, and TE, the identification of Cpk indicator was higher. Cpk can help improve the ability to control uncertainty of laboratory measurements. In addition, this indicator also can be used for comparison with peer laboratories. |