月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
查看詳細全文
篇名
基本國策之規範效力及其對社會正義之影響
並列篇名
Normative Effects of the Fundamental National Policies in Taiwanese Constitution and Their Influence on Social Justice
作者 林明昕
中文摘要
有關「社會正義」的議題,在我國憲法上,主要是集中在憲法第13章及增修條文第10條之「基本國策」的規定。惟相對於社會正義涉及基本國策條文的規範「內容」,本文所處理者,則是有關該類型之憲法條文如何針對此一規範內容,發揮其誡命作用的規範「效力」問題。在透過德國基本法中「基本權利」與「國家目標規定」,以及歐盟基本權利憲章中「權利」與「原則」之區分的比較法制之觀察後,本文確定:基本國策規定,非往昔所稱的「方針條款」,而係具有法拘束力的憲法規範。其一方面得以提供國家以法律限制人民基本權利的合憲性目的基礎;另一方面亦得基於事物關連性,就相關基本權利的「保護範圍」與「功能」等作內容上的填充。此外,前開已作為基本權利之填充的相關基本國策規定,其除既有的客觀法面向外,是否亦有主觀權利之性質,應依基本權利之相關議題的認定方式作個案判斷,非得全盤予以否定。職是,在我國憲法釋義學上,社會正義之議題,得利用各相關連之基本國策與基本權利等規範類型間的相互制約、填充及回饋之作用處理。
英文摘要
Issues of social justice are addressed in Chapter 13 of the Constitution and Article 10 of the Amendment to the Constitution regarding “fundamental national policies”. Rather than explaining the “content” of constitutional norms on fundamental national policies, the purpose of this article is to explore the normative “effect” of these constitutional norms. Through a comparative analysis of “fundamental rights” and “national goal regulations” in the German Basic Law and the distinction between “rights” and “principles” in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, it is argued that constitutional norms on fundamental national policies should be considered norms with direct binding effect, rather than “program clauses”. As norms with direct binding effect, these constitutional norms on fundamental national policies can serve as a constitutional basis for the government to impose legal restrictions on people’s fundamental rights. They can also serve a supplementary function in the interpretation of the “area of protection” and the “functions” of fundamental rights based on the relatedness of things. The normative nature of these constitutional norms is objective law, but they can also be considered subjective rights, which shall be determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance to the nature of fundamental rights issues involved. It is concluded that the restrictive, supplementary and feedback relationship of the constitutional norms on fundamental national policies and fundamental rights can function to deal with issues of social justice.
起訖頁 1305-1358
關鍵詞 社會正義基本國策基本權利社會基本權利客觀法social justicefundamental national policiesfundamental rights
刊名 國立臺灣大學法學論叢  
期數 201611 (45:特刊期)
出版單位 國立臺灣大學法律學系
該期刊-上一篇 論稅捐正義的追尋:從憲法平等原則到稅法量能課稅原則的路徑
該期刊-下一篇 大法官解釋與社會正義之實踐
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄