英文摘要 |
Ever since its publication in 2001, Zadie Smith's White Teeth has earned critical acclaim and widespread media attention. Critics hail the novel for its negotiation with multiculturalism, rewriting of Englishness, and celebration of heterogeneous identities that are both hybridized and carnivalesque. That most critics have ”seen” nothing else in the novel but identity politics reflects, on the one hand, that such ”identity talk” continues to cast its spell on the critical community today. On the other hand, this collective identitarianism also suggests theoretical fixation and aporia, as critics were blackmailed into a conceptual deadlock framed either by the logic of specificity or by that of the community. Whereas it is undeniable that Smith's novel does underscore ethnic differences, it is a novel that also poses questions about the reconfiguration of subjectivity and probes into the possibilities of conducting a life style that is ethical as well as non-indifferent. This paper proposes to respond to the ethical possibilities entertained by Smith's White Teeth by reading it alongside and with Eric Santner's formulation of the ”psychotheology of the everyday” and Slavoj Žižek's proposition of the ”ethical act. ” I argue that heightened identity conflicts in a multi-ethnic context figure as excesses that cut into the fabrics of the subject's everyday life, with the cuts and disruptions signifying not only subversions and resistances but also calls that demand the subject both to confront the contingency of everyday life, and to act under the ethical imperative to go beyond ”the uncanny interpellation of ideological interpellations.” The ruptures of the everyday life, so understood, mark the arrival of miracles, for these everyday ruptures not only ”reveal” the stakes of the subject's reliance upon excessive reflexivity but also show the utter contingency of events that change the very course of life as it is lived. The path to redemption is a course of love that opens the subject to moments of surprises and traumatic intimacy with the Neighbor-as-Stranger-as-Foreigner-as-Brother. It is an ethics of the everyday that goes beyond the confines of the everyday. |