從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構

Constructing a Typology for Court-Referred Males of Intimate Partner Violence based on Changing Relationalism Perspectives

男性親密暴力有其變異性，因此實用有效的分類是理解其心理機制的重要基礎。目前較受關注的國 內外分類架構皆未考量華人關係主義及其變遷的影響性，且常植基於受暴女性觀點，以致未能周延 反映台灣強制處遇男性親密暴力者的主觀經驗。因此本研究嘗試從華人關係主義文化變遷的適應觀 點出發，以強制處遇男性親密暴力者的經驗敘說為主體，佐以司法文件作為校正素材，進行分類建 構。為達此目的，本研究在方法學上遵循建構主義典範，邀請24 名男性接受半結構深度訪談，其中 6 人為家暴專監的親密暴力收容人，18 人為某地方法院裁定社區親密暴力強制處遇之相對人，所得 訪談文本以共識質性研究法進行分析。研究結果綜合出五個分類向度，包括華人父權認同與親密暴 行、伴侶角色實踐的省思、從子女關注到伴侶關注、酒精使用、人格與臨床症狀；據此五個向度將 受訪者分成四個類型，包括自我調整型、避罰傳統型、混亂再犯型、反擊型。本研究並針對研究結 果與其意涵進行討論。

Males who commit intimate partner violence vary across cases， so a practical and valid typological frame work is essential for understanding the psychological mechanisms and characteristics of male perpetratorsviolence. However， many well-known western typologies have not considered traditional Chinese Relationalism and the changing context within the Taiwanese society. Additionally， existing typologies are often based on female descriptions about male batterers; thus， they are limited in terms of their utility in understanding the subjective phenomenon of male batterers. Therefore， there is an urgent need to construct an indigenous typology according to the narratives of male perpetrators within the context of Chinese Relationalism and its changing situation within the Taiwanese society. In addition， this study also considered the crime diaries of male batterers， forensic documents， and court statements. To achieve this goal， this study followed the constructivism paradigm and adopted the consensual qualitative research approach method to analyze the text. Twenty four interviewees were invited as participants for semi-structural in-depth interviews; they had committed intimate partner violence and violated domestic law. The results indicated that the interviewees could be divided into four types according to the following five dimensions: Reflect related to Relationalism patriarchy; criticism to role duties of partners; concerns about parenting; alcoholic use; and personality disorder and clinical symptoms. The four types are as follows: Self-modification， following-law and tradition， distress， and fighting-back. Based on the results， practical implications and directions for future research were discussed.