中文摘要 |
本文是第一篇從女性漫遊者的角度,探索現代街頭與地鐵攝影的論文。從波特萊爾(Charles Baudelaire)以來,漫遊者(“flâneur”)一直被視為現代藝術家的典型,在藝術史與文學史中的相關研究汗牛充棟,從1980年代下半開始,女性主義學者才開始爭辯在現代時期是否有女性漫遊者(“flâneur”)?伍爾芙(Janet Wolff)與波洛克(Griselda Pollock)以降的學者,一再地論辯出悲觀的結論。當筆者開始以海倫‧勒薇(Helen Levitt, 1913-2009)的具體個案,探尋女性漫遊者的活動蹤跡,豁然發現勒薇與公共空間的邂逅,確實激盪出與男性漫遊攝影家殊異的視象與歷史。勒薇從1930年代晚期迄今,一直是深受喜愛的街頭攝影家之一。藉由對照勒薇與影響她的布烈松(HenriCartier-Bresson)、艾文斯(Walker Evans)的街頭與地鐵攝影,筆者發現,相對於這兩位男性漫遊者以保持距離、抽象、普遍的觀視來認識城市生活,勒薇表達了一種女性漫遊者對城市的獨特觀看方式:她仍然保持漫遊者的隱匿感,卻喜歡拍攝住家附近的地方性街頭,正如她自述「可以感受到人們感受到的」,因而比當時幾位男性街頭攝影家有「更多的同理心(empathy)」(Gopnik, 2001: 90),藉由隱匿地拍攝住家附近的地方性街頭,勒薇得以默默地感受人們對活動的熱衷,以及彼此之間的情感連繫,以同理心捕捉一種洋溢著社區性與親密感的公共空間。 |
英文摘要 |
This article explores the street photographs and subway photographs taken by the "flâneuse". Since Charles Baudelaire, the "flâneur", or the idle stroller, has been regarded as the "ur-form" of the modern artist, writer and intellectual who anonymously wanders amid the flux and flow of the crowd in the city streets and arcades and keenly scrutinizes and studies the crowd-with aloof detachment. For about a century, the "flânerie" was treated as a white, bourgeois, artistic male privilege. In the late 1980s, feminist scholars began to debate the possibility of a female "flânerie". Against their negative arguments, this paper presents a case study of Helen Levitt's vision of female "flânerie" in the poor areas of the New York City. Comparing Levitt's street and subway photographs with Henri Cartier-Bresson's and Walker Evans's similar works, I find that her photographs exhibit a special vision of a "flâneuse", who tends to remain detached and yet to empathize with the people in their enthusiastic activities and their intimate connectedness in their community-oriented lives in the street. |