英文摘要 |
Confronted with the tricky abuse of the literary expression “small certain happiness” for commercial purposes in Taiwan in recent years, which has inflicted contemporary men and women living on a small income with an even more miserable life full of futile pursuits for the satisfaction of artificial needs created by capitalist society, this paper aims both to explore the term’s original meaning, that is, Haruki Murakami’s original connotation in using the term, distinguishing it from the more popular but distorted usage, and also to find salvation for people who have been trapped in the post-capitalist labyrinth according to Žižek’s materialist theology. The paper is divided into four sections. In Section One, I explore the original meaning of the term in question against the background of its distorted usages as well as the heated discussions and criticisms over its significance. In Section Two, I explain, based on Žižek’s materialist interpretation of Schelling’s philosophy, how the original (that is, Murakami’s) “small certain happiness” takes place, how it becomes a mystery at the moment of the subject’s awareness of it, and how it is pursued (though fruitlessly) by the subject in the labyrinth of our capitalist society through the function of symbolic structure. In Section Three, I explore Žižek’s materialist theology which is constructed on the bases of Badiou’s notion of “pure multiplicity” and Lacan’s “feminine logic,” or the ontological notion of “not-all,” aiming to see the possibility of applying it to current cultural phenomena. Finally, in the last section, I conclude the paper with the proposition that we must take Žižek’s materialist theology into serious consideration so that further afflictions caused by the infinite desire pursuits in capitalist society can be avoided and the real (that is, Murakami’s) “small certain happiness” can be possibly achieved. |