應用無線通訊技術於睡眠多項生理檢查儀之可行性研究

Wireless Communication Technology Applications of Polysomnography (PSG) in Hospitals: A Case Study on a Demonstration Wireless Project in a Taiwan Hospital

本研究旨在運用無線通訊技術於睡眠多項生理檢查儀（Polysomnography ， PSG） ，讓有睡眠障礙的病患可以降低黏貼於身上多項生理訊號感應器的不舒 適感以及未來期望可達成居家檢測的目標。研究的對象為某區域教學醫院之 睡眠中心的病患，所使用的設備為本實驗設計的ZígBee 無線通訊技術的血氧 飽和指數（SP02 ）感應測量裝置。本次研究之內容主要是針對有線型與無線 型這兩種感應測量裝置作食指與中指SP02 數值正確性及病患滿意度之比較。 研究結果得知： （l）針對兩者問之正確性進行比較分析，運用T-test 統計方法 分析其值為0.326 （P<0.05） ，表示有線型的食指與中指兩者間無差異；此外有 線型的食指和無線型的食指其值為0.349 （P<0.05） ，也表示兩者間無差異；以 及有線型的中指和無線型的中指其值為0 .4 11 （P<0.05） ，同樣表示兩者間無差 異。（2 ）針對兩者問之病患滿意度進行比較分析，得到結果為「非常滿意佔 6.7%」， 「滿意佔80% 」， 「尚可佔10% 」， 「不滿意佔3.3% 」， 「非常不滿意 佔O%」。病患滿意度主要是認同無線型的比有線型的黏貼於身上的感應器數 量減少相對也感到較舒適，並且也提升睡覺翻身時活動上方便性。

This research aims at using wireless communication technology to check the appearance in multiple physiology of sleep (Polysomnography, PSG), let patient to have sleep-disorder can is it paste multiple physiological signal comfort and expect goal that can reach at home measuring future of inductor at body to reduce. The target of studying is a patient in the sleep centre of one regional teaching hospital, reaction measure the device for the blood oxygen saturation index (SPO2) of ZigBee wireless communication technology based on equipment experimental design used. The content of this research is mainly to measuring the comparison that the device did forefinger and middle finger SPO2 number value exactness and patient’s satisfaction with wireless type these two kinds of reaction wiredly type. Whether result of study learn. (1) Carry on comparative analysis to the exactness between the two, use T-test statistical method to analyse that its value is 0.326 (P<0.05), there is not a difference with the middle finger between the two to show the wired type forefinger; In addition wired type forefinger and wireless type its value of forefinger are 0.349 (P<0.05), show that there is not a difference between the two; And wired type middle finger and wireless type its value of middle finger are 0.411 (P<0.05), show too that there is not a difference between the two. (2) Carry on comparative analysis to patient satisfaction between the two, receive result for being ‘very satisfied to account for 6.7%’, ‘account for 80% satisfiedly’, ‘can still account for 10%’, ‘unsatisfied and account for 3.3%’, ‘very unsatisfied and account for 0%’. Patient’s satisfaction is mainly to relatively feel more comfortable to approve wireless type reducing than the quantity of inductor on the body of wired type pasting too, and improve and sleep the convenience on the activity while standing up.