英文摘要 |
In recent years, almost all caregivers are required to conduct surveys of patients satisfaction. The critiques of patient satisfaction surveys have led to a new emphasis on measuring patients experience rather than satisfaction. The Picker Institute Europe has conducted such questionnaires to ask patients to report in detail on their experience of a particular provider at a specific point in time instead of asking patients to rate their care on a Likert scale. The main problem is that Picker as traditional others directly operated factor analysis on ordinal scores to justify its inference. In this study, we apply Rasch analysis (Rasch, 1960) to examine whether all items conform to the model s expectation so that the underlying latent trait can be quantified. We analyzed the data of the 2003 England Inpatient Questionnaire from a total 169 hospitals. With permission, we downloaded a total of 169 hospital datasheets from the 2003 England Inpatient Questionnaire of the Picker Institute Europe. The original indicator questions have been scored using a scale of 0 to 100. The scores represent the extent to which the patient s experience could have been improved. The rating scale model was fitted to these items using the computer software Winsteps (Linacre, 1999). Items with outfit or infit MNSQ not in the range of .05 and 1.5 are usually diagnosed as potential misfits to Rasch model conditions and considered for deletion from the assessed sequence. Successive Rasch analyses were performed until a final set of items satisfied the model fit requirements. The results show that 29 of the 45 items fitted the model s expectation fairly well. The most difficult items for the hospitals to earn inpatients satisfaction were staff-patient communication, whereas general practices were easier to receive patients satisfaction. No statistically significant differences between specialist hospitals and teaching hospitals were found. |