災難的永續社會學探討：後九二一地震的「恐懼修省」

A Study of Sustainable Sociology: Reflection on 921 Earthquake Disaster

本篇主要分成兩個單元闡述，首先是災難與災異的永續社會學思維，第一部分嘗試藉由災難社會學的概念對話，論述永續發展的主軸面向，融入哈伯馬斯與貝克對危機、風險的思維，取捨魯曼的系統觀點，以期建立理解災難的思維起點，第二部分則由永續發展的三生構面，探討災難對社會生成變化的衝擊，並以九二一地震的災難經驗為論述主題，與永續社會學進行多面向的觀照闡發，以及震災治理的行事要則。第二單元則是以《公羊春秋》與《易經》的相關理念，進行永續關懷的災難思維探討，整理《公羊春秋》對災異事況書寫，論述政道治術的利弊得失，討論災異書寫對統治者的正位批判與反身性批判，亦可視為天人批判的象徵鬥爭。另則詮釋《易經震卦》的時位繫辭與卦爻的錯綜摩盪，闡述對地震災難的行事，由卦爻的辭旨觀玩與其時位結構，綜合提出災難的治理原則。整體而言，本篇論文有再深入闡述的必要，藉由理論概念的多元反思與綜合交融，有助於災難社會學的建構開展，對於臺灣永續發展與災難治理要則，提出可參照的「恐懼修省」哲學。

This study tries to construct sociology of disaster with concepts of sustainable development, while emphasizing the importance of local sustainable agenda and agencies which includes how to maintain the equilibrium of three dimensions of economic production, social life and ecological environment after 1999's 921 earthquake disaster. The social crisis theory of Habermas, Beck's analysis of risk society and Luhmann's ideas of system theory are also discussed in this paper.”Gongyong Chunqiu” emphasizes the responsibilities of government to undertake the shock and hurt of natural disaster. Facing abnormal and disaster phenomenon of nature, Confucianism adopted symbolic struggle and aroused structural critic and reflexive critic actions.The experience of disaster governance actions could be contemplated by thinking and interpreting the words and hexagrams of ”I Ching”. Hexagrams of ”I Ching” Zhengua were meaningful to play the fields of words combined with possible circumstances of changing conditions of disaster process. It's interesting to observe phenomena and to play meanings of words to construct sociology of disaster which can inspire other themes of sociological imagination.