“對接”的“父愛”－－評《侵權責任法》第56條中的“醫療權”

The Butt Contacted Paternalism-- On the 56th Clause of Tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China

兩年前的李麗雲案與新出台的《侵權責任法》第56條關於醫療權的規定有重要聯繫，該法條與包括《醫療機構管理條例》等在內的原有規範體系形成了合理的“對接”，並把醫療權“升格”至法律層面；同時，該條與第55條知情同意的規定形成了“原則－－例外”模式的對接。第56條的規定具有濃郁的父愛主義色彩，但與之前的審議稿中的表述相比，這種色彩有所退卻，這是對醫患雙方實際能力與情況進行考量和平衡的結果。

The 56th clause of Tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China (TLLPRC), which describes the right of curing, is connected with the case of Li Liyun that happened two years ago. This clause reasonably butt contacted the existing relative rules including Implementation of the Administrative Regulations on Medical Institution and highlighted the right of curing to the level of law. Meanwhile, it butt contacts the 55th clause of TLLPRC and forms the model of Principle-Exception. The 56th is paternalistic but the paternalistic color faded compared to the draft, which is the result of balancing the abilities of the hospitals and the patients.