民國時期票據立法活動初探－－兼與1995年票據立法比較

中華民國1929年票據法被公認為是一部具有很強前瞻性和可行性的成功立法。其成功主要有三個原因：一是北洋政府時期起草了五部票據法草案，並進行了深入的討論，這為1929年票據法打下了良好的基礎。二是南京政府在起草票據法的時候，吸收了較多專家學者參加立法，避免了“內行起草，外行審稿”而出現的失誤。另外，南京政府工商部提交的草案比較完善。三是當時的民間團體（主要是上海銀行公會）積極推動票據法立法，為立法活動提供了重要的輿論和智力支持。相比之下，1995年票據立法由於指導思想上的偏差和立法機關的失誤，出現了許多重大的原則問題，給審判工作帶來了很大的困扰和混亂。當前正在進行的民法典立法工作應該吸取這些歷史的經驗和教訓。

The Law of Negotiable Instruments of 1929 was thought to be a farsighted and feasible law. The success of the law attributed to three reasons: firstly, the five drafts of negotiable instruments in BeiYang government period founded a good foundation for the Law of Negotiable Instruments of 1929; secondly, when Nanjing government drafted the law, many experts took part in the legislation. Moreover, the draft put forward by the Industrial and Commercial Ministry was comparatively perfect; thirdly, many folk associations (especially Shang-Hai Banking Association) promoted the legislation of the law actively. Due to the warp of legislative ideas and the mistakes of the legislative institutions, there were many great Problems in the Law of Negotiable Instruments of 1995, which disturbed trials. During the drafting of the civil Code, we should learn the experiences and lessons of the past.