香煙平裝法案的合法性分析及我國的因應對策

Analyses of the Legality of Tobacco Plain Package Act and Countermeasures of China

在菲力普莫里斯國際煙草公司（菲莫公司）的子公司對烏拉圭、澳大利亞提起的國際投資爭端仲裁中，香煙平裝法案的合法性成為國際社會關注的熱點問題。在有關國際投資爭端仲裁庭作出裁決之前，對菲莫公司子公司的仲裁請求進行深入分析是很有必要的，因為作為《煙草控制框架公約》的締約國，我國有必要制定類似的相關立法，而此類研究有助於使我國的控煙立法取得合法性。

In the international investment dispute arbitration cases of Philip Morris Companies Inc. (PM) v. Uruguay / Australia, the legitimacy of Tobacco Plain Package Act became a hot issue that international society focused on. Before settling the above international investment dispute arbitration cases, it’s necessary to analyses the arbitration claims of PM, because as a contracting party of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, China should make similar law for the Control of Tobacco, and this kind of research will serve to the legitimacy of the law for the Control of Tobacco in China.