英文摘要 |
This research note, the third in a series of sketches on what I entitle “One hundred years of entanglement: cultural, political and territorial,” will tackle the complex and ever changing relations between China and Taiwan. It is divided into three parts: the first part will describe and analyze the controversy of unification versus independence in Taiwan, with the Chinese Nationalist Party leaning towards unification and the Democratic Progressive Party to the side of independence. Then, I will proceed to the pressures from Beijing for unification by military threats and trade inducements, and the resistance put up by the government, the Democratic Progressive Party and a large segment of the civil society. The second part of this note will concentrate on the position and attitude of the civil society organizations and NGOs in Taiwan and abroad for independence. They merged with the Democratic Progressive Party in the 1990s. I will briefly survey the careers of a number of their prominent leaders, so as to indicate the tortuous and slippery path the politicians trod. In the third part I would present the solutions that have been endorsed by many politicians and scholars to break the deadlock, namely some kinds of commonwealth, confederation or federation schemes. However, these solutions were and still are absolutely rejected by Beijing. Against this background, I propose to appeal to two new groups to break the deadlock. They are the migrant workers and the new immigrants. Since the early 1990s the need for workers to sustain economic development has opened the door to immigrant workers and the need for young women of marriageable age for Taiwanese men has brought “foreign spouses” to Taiwan. The former primarily came from Southeast Asia, and the latter from China and Southeast Asia. Both groups have been severely exploited and discriminated against. However, the past thirty years have also witnessed an effort in Taiwan to abide by international human rights law, thus providing legitimacy for these two groups to strive for their rights and freedoms they so clearly deserve. All indicators point to the probability that they will be given citizenship in the not so distant future. Within ten to twenty years, they will definitely become a powerful political force in Taiwan and their diverse cultural heritage will no doubt contribute to a culturally pluralistic and more democratic society. At that point, internal politics in Taiwan, the confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist Party and the Democratic Progressive Party, will be revamped, and the dispute between China and Taiwan redefined, no longer framed by the legacy of “the same culture and the same race” and traditional Confucian ethics. A new beginning will then be possible. |