月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
技術及職業教育學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
科技校院教師評鑑的後設評鑑
並列篇名
Meta-evaluation of Faculty Evaluation of Technological College and University
作者 曾淑惠 (Shu-Hui Tseng)
中文摘要
本研究旨在藉由對科技校院教師評鑑品質及提議的探究,勾勒出科技校院教 師評鑑的樣貌,主要採專家訪談、德懷術及問卷調查三種方法,共計9 位專家接 受訪談、15 位擔任德懷術專家進行三回合問卷以凝聚共識,並發展問卷共寄發715 份,回收486 位教師的意見(問卷回收率68%)。主要研究結果包括:(一)衡量 科技校院教師評鑑品質的規準,計有適切性、效用性、可行性以及精確性四項度 計41 項規準內容;(二)私立學校教師對其所屬學校教師評鑑制度,在效用、可 行以及精確性品質規準肯定度不高;(三)設計科技校院教師評鑑制度仍有五大類 的議題須要留意。
英文摘要
This study focused on the quality and proposals of faculty evaluation in universities/colleges of technology. It was conducted mainly through expert interview, the Delphi technique, and questionnaire survey. Specifically, there were 9 experts interviewed. As for the Delphi method procedure, 15 scholars were consulted in three rounds in order to reach a consensus. Totally, 486 questionnaires were collected from faculty in universities/colleges of technology. The result of the study was as follows: 1.The criteria for measuring the quality of faculty evaluation in universities/colleges of technology include 4 dimensions, i.e. the propriety, the utility, the feasibility, and the accuracy, all of which consist of 41 items of the criteria. 2. When it comes to the individual faculty evaluation system, faculty of the private universities/colleges of technology show low confidence in the quality of the indicators referring to the utility, the feasibility, and the accuracy. 3. During evaluation system design processes, there are 5 issues to take good care of.
起訖頁 041-063
關鍵詞 科技校院教師評鑑後設評鑑universities/colleges of technologyfaculty evaluationmeta-evaluation
刊名 技術及職業教育學報  
期數 201505 (6:1期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系
該期刊-上一篇 日本職業教育人才培育制度之啟示
該期刊-下一篇 產業導向電子儀器技能多元學習策略發展及其成效驗證之研究
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄