高中體育教科書評鑑和不同版本之比較研究－－以第一冊為例

Evaluations and Comparisons for the volume-1 of Physical Education Textbooks (PETs) of senior high schools in Taiwan

本研究之目的在瞭解第一冊高中體育教科書之評鑑情形，並比較各版本高中體育教科書之評鑑類目是否有差異。研究對象為高中體育教師166位，研究方法採用問卷調查法，研究工具為「高中體育教科書評鑑量表」，資料分析方法為平均數、標準差、單因子變異數分析及結構方程模式等。研究結果：一、第一冊高中體育教科書評鑑類目之得分屬於好的程度，包括：課程目標、教材內容、教學實施、教學評量、出版特性、輔助措施及整體評鑑等類目；二、各版本高中體育教科書在出版特性、課程目標、教材內容、教學實施、教學評量、輔助措施及整體評鑑等七個類目上，未達顯著差異，且上述評鑑類目之得分屬於好的程度。結論：一、第一冊高中體育教科書之評鑑情形，屬於好的程度。二、各版本高中體育教科書在各個評鑑類目，並未達顯著差異情形。建議各出版社能夠長期投入課程研發，以維持體育教科書之品質。此外，政府部門應積極獎勵各出版社進行教材實驗，或進行教科書產業補貼或獎勵教科書投資等，以維持體育教科書之品質。

The purposes of this study were to understand evaluations for the volume-1 of Physical Education Textbooks (PETs) of senior high schools in Taiwan, and to compare evaluations for each edition of PETs. The subjects were 166 physical educators. The research method was questionnaire, and the instrument was the scale for evaluation of PETs. Those data were collected and analyzed by descriptive statistic, such as frequency, average, standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, and structure equation model (SEM). The results were as in the follows: a) the evaluative scores on those factors for the volume-1 of PETs were good level, such as physical characteristics, purposes of curriculum, teaching contents, instruction, teaching assessment, assistant methods, and whole factor. b) Evaluative scores on those factors for the volume-1 of each edition, such as physical characteristics, purposes of curriculum, teaching contents, instruction, teaching assessment, assistant methods, and whole factor, were not significantly different, and those scores were good level. In conclusion, the evaluative scores on those factors for the volume-1 of PETs were good level, and those scores of each edition were not different. In addition, the PETs of each edition of senior high schools were assimilated. It advised that the publishers needed to spend more money to develop the curriculum of PETs to improve the quality of them. Furthermore, the government also needed to reward the publishers to have experiments for subject matters to enhance the quality of them.