中文摘要 |
目的:探討以不同強度(80%、65%與50%)之心跳率控制(heart rate control,HRC)測驗與心跳控制強度變異指標(intensity variance by heart rate control,IVHRC)應用於划船測功儀之信效度,並建立預測運動表現的迴歸模式。方法:以划船選手16名(男性7名、女性9名,年齡18.9±2.08歲、身高167.7±7.83公分、體重63.1±8.16公斤與訓練經歷4.8±2.08年)為對象,受試者分別接受划船測功儀上的漸增負荷測驗、2000公尺衝刺測驗(2000max)以及80%、65%與50%最大心跳率(HRmax=220-年齡)之2000公尺HRC測驗各兩次,同時分別記錄每500公尺所完成的時間獲得IVHRC進行分析。結果:信度分析結果顯示,不同強度之HRC時間與IVHRC皆有相當高的再測信度(ICC=.89~.98,p<.05),且兩次測驗結果並無差異。同時效度分析顯示不同強度HRC運動時間與2000max(r=.81~.90,p<.05)、V.O2max(r=-.76~-.85,p<.05)、Wpeak(r=-.80~-.85,p<.05)皆達顯著相關;不同強度IVHRC與2000max(r=-.82~-.87,p<.05)、V.O2max(r=.72~.81,p<.05)、Wpeak(r=.80~.84,p<.05)亦有顯著相關。進一步簡單與逐步多元迴歸分析顯示,不同強度HRC具有良好的預測效度(R2=.63~.80,p<.05),且80%HRC結合50%IVHRC為預測2000公尺運動表現的最佳模式(R2=.89,p<.05)。結論:HRC與IVHRC於划船測功儀運動具良好的信效度,可應用於划船運動強度監控與預測運動表現。Purpose: to evaluate the validity and reliability of heart rate control (HRC) at 80%, 65%, 50% age-predicted HRmax and intensity variance index (IVHRC) index, as well as optimal predictive model on rowing ergometer. Methods: Sixteen rowers (7 males and 9 females, 18.9 ± 2.08 yrs, height: 167.7 ± 7.83cm, weight: 63.1 ± 8.16kg) were recruited to participate in an incremental test (V.O2max and Wpeak obtained), and a 2000m performance test (2000max). In addition, 2 trials of 2000m rowing at 80%, 65%, 50% HRmax at least 24hrs apart were also performed, and time to 500m, 1000m, 1500m and 2000m were recorded to obtain HRC index. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis showed that HRC and IVHRC at different intensity of HRmax have high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89~0.99, p < .05), and there was no significant difference between 2 HRC trials. HRC at different intensities of HRmax in 2000m rowing trials showed significant correlation with 2000max (r = .81~ .90, p < .05), V ‧ O2max (r = - .76~- .85, p < .05) and Wpeak (r = - .80~ - .85, p < .05). Moreover, IVHRC at different intensities of HRmax were also correlated with 2000max (r = - .82~ - .87, p <0.05), V.O2max (r = .72~ .81, p < .05) and Wpeak (r = .80~ .84, p < .05); All of which showed both HRC and IVHRC have good concurrent validity. Simple linear and stepwise regression analysis indicated that HRC and IVHRC also have high predictive validity (R2 = 0.63~0.89, p< .05) in 2000max assessment. Conclusion: HRC and IVHRC indices were valid and reliable in applying on rowing exercise, which can be applied in monitoring exercise intensity and predicting performance on rowing exercise. |