英文摘要 |
For realists regionalism remains a difficult phenomenon to explicate. A particular puzzle for realists is why major states should want to pursue regional institutionalization. Nor are pluralist accounts satisfactory given the empirical evidence of state actor prominence in processes of regional institutionalization. On this basis a specific theory of co-operative hegemony is developed. Stressing the importance of the grand strategies of major regional powers and their responses to the balance-of-threat in a region, the article argues that Asia-Pacific major states may advance their interests through non-coercive means by applying a strategy of co-operative hegemony. The article outlines a number of preconditions for regional institutionalization, stressing what is called the capacity for power-sharing; the power aggregation capacity and the commitment capacity of the biggest power in a region. While regionalizing state elites are constrained, they possess a much greater freedom of choice than neo-realism claims. Regional integration initiatives of Asia-Pacific by mainly major states or organizations almost all are dependent on the point of view of power as proposed or participation guidelines. |