英文摘要 |
Abstract: in order to repair, regenerate, and replace damaged tissue or organ induced either by diseases or trauma, various fields of emerging biotechnology and biomaterials are converging into the discipline of tissue engineering. Currently, the term ‘‘tissue engineering’’ has come to integrate tissue substitutes or isolated cells, scaffold materials, and bioactive peptides or molecules and is, at the beginning, used to guide repair, replacement or new formation of a wide variety of tissues. Osteogenesis is a pivotal issue in the field of periodontal regeneration. Traditional periodontal treatment is unable to fulfill our goals in tissue regeneration. Clinical research in bone substitute graft for treatment of periodontal osseous defects had been started in early 1960. However, clinical results are not predictable. In 1982, Nyman proposed a “cell exclusion technique by membrane barrier” and successfully used Millipore as a barrier membrane to protect the bone defects, and finally gained bone regeneration of the defects (the concept of “Guided Tissue Regeneration”). Thereafter, various bone substitutes, and implanted scaffolds with or without active peptide or factors, irrespective of natural materials or biosynthetic, are subjected to intensive investigation. Today, the most prevalent implanted materials for guided tissue regeneration and regenerative medicine are collagen-related and high molecular weight biosynthetic materials including polylactic acid polymers, or copolymer of polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid. Due to a rapid progress of knowledge and technique in the field of biotechnology, the bioactive peptides or factors, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), enamel matrix-derived protein, and many bone morphogenetic proteins, have been actively integrated into clinical application and become the most important potential scaffold candidates in regenerative medicine. To effectively utilize the biological activity of these bioactive peptides, combination of them with biocompatible scaffold is mandatory. However, there are still many shortcomings in their chemical and biological properties such as rates of resorption, sustained release of incorporated peptides, mechanical strength etc., no matter of natural or synthetic scaffold. The future work in the field of periodontal tissue engineering must be focused on the improvement of physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of these scaffolds when they are used in combination with bioactive peptides. |