月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
教育心理學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
後形式思考與人際關係之容忍性、同理心、自我揭露、自主性之關係
並列篇名
The Relationships between Postformal thinking and Tolerance、Empathy、Self-disclosure、Autonomy of Interpersonal Relations
作者 邱文彬林美珍 (Mei-Chen Lin)
中文摘要
本研究目的在探討後形式思考與成熟人際關係之容忍性、同理心、自我揭露、自主性之關係,受試為644位分佈於青年期後期至成人期的受試,以問卷法蒐集資料進行驗証件研究,資料分析採用計畫比較。由於後形式思考包括相對性思考與辯証性思考兩種型式,因此,四對計畫比較分別為相對性思考組與形式性思考組、辯証性思考組與形式性思考組、辯証性思考組與相對性思考組、與後形式思考組與形式性思考組,並在每個人際向度上分別進行上述四對平均數考驗。結果發現:1.後形式思考組的容忍性高於形式性思考組,辯証性思考組的容忍性高於相對性思考組,相對性思考組的容忍性高於形式性思考組;2.後形式思考組的同理心高於形式性思考組,辯証性思考組的同理心高於相對性思考組,相對性思考組的同理心高於形式性思考組;3.後形式思考組的自我揭露有效性高於形式性思考組,辯証性思考組的自我揭露有效性高於形式性思考組與相對性思考組:4.後形式思考組的自主性高於形式性思考組,辯証性思考組的自主性高於形式性思考組與相對性思考組。本研究討論上述發現的意義,並提出未來研究建議與人際關係實際應用的啟示。
英文摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between postformalthinking and tolerance - empathy 、 self-disclosure 、 autonomy of mature interpersonalrelations. Subjects were 644, ranging from late adolescence to adulthood ( range from 16 to80 years ) . Questionnaire was used as the research method. Planned contrasts were used fordata analysis. As postformal thinking includes relativistic thinking and dialectical thinkingboth, the four contrasts were relativistic thinking group and formalistic thinking group,dialectical thinking group and formalistic thinking group, dialectical thinking group andrelativistic thinking group, postformal thinking group and formalistic thinking group. Thereare four planned contrasts on each of four dimensions of mature interpersonal relations. Theresults were : I. The tolerance of the postformal thinking group was higher than theformalistic thinking group's, the tolerance of the dialectical thinking group was higher thanthe relativistic thinking group's, the tolerance of the relativistic thinking group was higherthan the formalistic thinking group's. 2.The empathy of the postformal thinking group washigher than the formalistic thinking group's, the empathy of the dialectical thinking groupwas higher than the relativistic thinking group's, the empathy of the relativistic thinkinggroup was higher than the formalistic thinking group's. 3.The self-disclosure of thepostformal thinking group was higher than the formalistic thinking group's, the self-disclosure of the dialectical thinking group was higher than the relativistic thinking group'sand the formalistic thinking group's. 4.The autonomy of the postformal thinking group washigher than the formalistic thinking group's, the autonomy of the dialectical thinking groupwas higher than the relativistic thinking group's and the formalistic thinking group's. Themeanings of above findings are discussed in the paper. According to these findings, there are suggestions of future research and implications for practical applications ininterpersonal relations.
起訖頁 67-93
關鍵詞 自主性自我揭露同理心容忍性後形式思考
刊名 教育心理學報  
期數 200008 (32:1期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系
該期刊-上一篇 大學轉變科系學生生涯決定歷程
該期刊-下一篇 「創造力發展的生態系統模式」及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄