現象學心理學的理論與應用（第二部份）：實徵與詮釋兩種應用模式系譜上的對照

Theory and Application of Phenomenological Psychology: A Genealogical Application of Empirical and Hermeneutical Modes

根據我們在 ＜現象學心理學的理論與應用（第一部份）＞的討論，現象學心理學為現象學哲學提供了一個嶄新的向度，那就是系譜現象學。針對超越現象與詮釋現象學之間理論上的困惑，它做了理論與實踐上的翻轉。那就是說，不只是為了符合「是什麼」的客觀理念，精心設計出一套「如何是」的方法步驟，更是根據各種領域裡所充實的各個不同之「是什麼」勾勒出現象學方法「如何是」的一般普遍性。故，繼＜第一部份＞在理論上的釐清之後，我們將在此第二部份中予以實務上的考察。首先，我們就喬齊(A. Giorgi)的一篇文章而論－－＜現象學方法作為一種質性研究程序的理論、應用與評價＞，以檢討超越現象學下的現象學心理學；其次，我們以余德慧的《詮釋現象心理學》一書做為討論的範本，說明詮釋現象學下的現象學心理學。

According to our discussion in “Theory and practice in phenomenological psychology (Part I)”, phenomenological psychology provides a brand new dimension, i.e., genealogical phenomenology. It is to reverse the relation of theory and practice as it entangles the theoretical puzzles caused by transcendental and hermeneutical phenomenology. That is to say, it is not merely to design a methodological procedure of “know how” in correspondence with the objective ideal of “what is”, but also to delineate ‘how to do” of a general phenomenological method in accordance with the fulfillment of “what is” in each and every individual disciplines. Thus, after our theoretical clarification of the first part, we are here giving practical exposition in the second part. First, we discuss A. Girorgi, “The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure” to examine phenomenological psychology in view of transcendental phenomenology. And then, we use Yu Der Hwei’s Interpretative Phenomenological Psychology as a model to explain phenomenological psychology in terms of hermeneutical phenomenology.