英文摘要 |
This paper attempts to analyze how ”the fall of the Luan clan” of the Jin state (晉「欒氏之滅」) is interpreted in various historiographical documents in pre-Qin and early Han periods, and discusses the association between the genre and the narrator's viewpoint and intention of those particular documents. The paper compares the differences in narrative-including aspects of plot, character image, theme, and viewpoint-between the ”Zuo Commentary” and ”Sayings of the States”, indicating that the two books, though only slightly different in plot, represent ”realities” of diverse views. It discusses in what way the content is associated with the genre in the narrative of the pre-Qin and early Han historiographical texts, both archaeological findings and textual records, with particular emphasis on ”The Chronicles” in ”Tsinghua Bamboo Slips II”. By comparing the ”Spring and Autumn Annals”, the ”Zuo Commentary”, ”Sayings of the States”, ”Records of the Grand Historian”, and ”The Chronicles”, the paper points out that ”The Chronicles” is of a different genre from the ”Spring and Autumn Annals”. The paper ends by focusing on pre-Qin and early Han historiographical documents regarding ”the Fall of the Luan clan,” such as the ”Gongyang Commentary”, ”Guliang Commentary”, ”The Annals of Lu Buwei”, ”Shizi”, etc. By illustrating the differences in genre among the books aforementioned, the present study expects to explain the relationship between narrative and genre in historiographical texts from pre-Qin to early Han periods. |