英文摘要 |
Are historical theories developed in the European context a suitable device for understanding the intricacy of Taiwan's past and present? Is it possible, in facing up to and dealing with the past of Taiwan, to conceptually apprehend ”history” that is often blurred by issues articulated in moral and ethic language? By discussing remarks made by anthropologists Lin Kai-shih and Chiu Yun-fang on the dramatic feature ”Seediq Bale”, I try to depict the image of the culturally and academically challenged indigenous history researchers, or ”inbetweeners,” as can be glimpsed in ”Seediq Bale” when viewed as alternatively defined ”history.” |