論王植對明清《正蒙》注之反思――以「太虛」之三層義為中心

Wang Zhi’s Rethinking of Qing and Ming Commentary on Zhengmeng：As Seen from Three Meanings of “The Great Void”

《正蒙初義》是歷來收錄《正蒙》注釋最為完整的作品之一。作者王植不僅保留了明、清時期《正蒙》注釋的重要成果，並且嘗試走出朱子學的詮釋框架，重新探索張載寫作《正蒙》時的哲學問題脈絡。故為吾人研究明清《正蒙》學所不可忽略的文獻。由於王植指出「太虛」是《正蒙》入手關頭。因此，本文從以下三方面展開討論：首先，嘗試釐清「太虛」三層義的各自意涵與相互串言之關係；其次，依據太虛之三層義，辨析王植對明清《正蒙》注的反思；最後，則在於探討王植如何以太虛三層義回應伊川、朱子對《正蒙》的批判，並開展出有別於程、朱的詮釋進路。

Zheng meng chu yi (The Original Meaning of Zheng meng) contains the most comprehensive collection of commentary on Zheng meng. Its author, Wang Zhi, not only preserved important research on Zheng meng from the Ming and Qing dynasties, he also attempted to sidestep the framework of interpretation put in place by Zhu Xi and thus be able to reevaluate the philosophical issues current at the time Zhang Zai wrote his work. As such, it is an invaluable tool for later scholars researching Zheng meng. Because Wang Zhi pointed out that the key to understanding Zheng meng is the concept of ”the Great Void,” this paper will explore it through three sections: first, the implications of the three different meanings of ”the Great Void will be delineated and the way they are interrelated discussed. Second, Wang Zhi's rethinking of Ming and Qing commentary will be appraised based on the three meanings of ”the Great Void.” Lastly, Wang Zhi's use of these three meanings in refuting criticism by Yi Chuan and Zhu Xi will be looked at, which effectively provides a new means of interpretation different from the Cheng Yi or Zhu Xi.