月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
臺大文史哲學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
「大政治」及「未來哲學」的同一性――對尼采整體哲學的一個詮釋
並列篇名
Identity between the “Great Politics” and the “Philosophy of Future”: An Interpretation of the Whole Philosophy of Nietzsche
作者 李建漳
中文摘要
我試圖用一個獨特的角度,對尼采哲學的整體作出一個詮釋:政治在尼采思想中佔據著什麼樣的地位?而我的假設及企圖證明的是:並沒有一個獨立的「尼采的政治哲學」,他的哲學,就是他的政治思想,因為在他對知識論及形上學的討論中,政治與存有者是同一的,政治是存有者必然的內在面向。因此,哲學與政治有同一性的關係,而這個同一性的完全展現,就是大政治與未來哲學。在此文,貫穿所有論證的是多元異質邏輯,只要實有是「多」或「差異」,政治面向就必然隱含其中,因為尼采始終以政治共同體之所以為一的方式來理解這個從多到一的過程。
英文摘要
This paper attempted to explore into the whole philosophy of Nietzsche from a different perspective: the role of the politics in Nietzsch's thought. It proposed that there was an identity between the great politics and the philosophy of future. That is, in Nietzsche's world, via the analysis of his epistemology and his understanding of metaphysics, the politics was always a first and intrinsic determination if people tried to understand the reality by following Nietzsche's logic of diversity and plurality. Also, through the model of body, Nietzsche intended to prove that the organism was nothing more than a process of organization, simply like a political organization in particular. What Nietzsche tried to do, in fact, was the revolution, since he believed that the Being was political and the way that one thing became real would be conceived as a process of politics: a political organization or a fight of multiples forces.
起訖頁 87-126
關鍵詞 尼采差異政治哲學知識論形上學Nietzschedifferencepolitical thoughtepistemologymetaphysics
刊名 臺大文史哲學報  
期數 201011 (73期)
出版單位 國立臺灣大學出版中心
該期刊-上一篇 關心靈魂
該期刊-下一篇 詞語的啟示與傳統――論哈曼對於康德先驗哲學的語文學後設批判
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄