英文摘要 |
To determine the contribution of lightness information of different hues during the process of achieving color identification under drastic changes of illumination simulated by computer, two types of lightness ranking are considered the 'anchoring criterion': (1) 'lightness ranking' acquired through machine measurement, and (2) 'brightness ranking' acquired through the subjects' subjective ranking which is subject to individual differences. Three research hypotheses were proposed based on the above setup: (H1) white patch hypothesis (WPH) : People consider the brightest point to be pure white and this achieves the best color identification; (H2) gray world assumption (GWA): People use the average lightness of the whole scene as the anchoring criterion and this achieves the best color identification; (H3) black patch hypothesis (BPH): People consider the darkest point to be pure black and this achieves best color identification. The results showed that: (1) sufficient illumination is a determining factor for good color identification but is not critical; (2) when lightness ranking is treated as the anchoring criterion for color identification, the subjects tend to rely on brightness rather than lightness; (3) when there is sufficient medium and long wavelength illumination, the subjects' performance tends to support the WPH but this can't be explained with either type of lightness ranking. This study therefore concludes that lightness ranking does not suit to be the criterion of color planning to designers, because the lightness ranking still does not possess regularity in color identification yet. |