英文摘要 |
The real purport of ”clinical” humanities is putting oneself in an unexpected (calamity or pain) situation and being unable to understand others' real situations and; hence uncovering oneself. Therefore, the so-called ”clinical humanities” ( a verb ) attempts to break the self recursion in humanities and social sciences and puts humanities and social sciences in a helpless and confused state. Then it can achieve humanistic development in human clinical sites, such as illness, disaster, loss of family member and other calamitous situations, while also forming an on-site humanistic support network.At various clinical sites, on the one hand the inertia of the humanities and social sciences should be broken, and the voice of suffering should be heard to obtain new self reflections. On the other hand, through self reflections, humanities and social sciences can transform and penetrate a suffering situation to extract profound humanistic knowledge. Under this context, ”clinical humanities” (a noun, referring to transformed humanities and social sciences) truly participates in human suffering situations and has a professional framework that is different from conventional suffering alleviation. It also has its own unique rhythms.The encounter of ”clinical humanities” and ”nursing care” can be seen as an odd connection of networks. Here, incompatibility exists between two odd things, and for nursing studies in their teaching and clinical purpose, humanities and social sciences seem to be at the scene as a stranger. The purpose of this article is to show the multiplicity of ”humanistic nursing care” and ”clinical humanities, nursing care and healing.” This article also highlights some of the alternative new meanings of ”clinical humanities” and is the true manifestation of the encounter between clinical humanities and ”nursing care.” |