運動教練倫理準則探析

On the Code of Ethics of Athletic Coaches

倫理準則是專業的重要條件，為提昇教練專業素質，我國於2010年訂定運動教練倫理準則。本文旨在分析運動教練倫理之內涵，透過文獻探討，首先論述運動教練倫理準則之意涵；次論我國與美、澳二國教練倫理準則之內容；再比較三個國家倫理準則之異同，歸納出共同點（一）教練角色定位：強調個人品德與身教的重要性；（二）述及對象：包括教練與運動員、觀眾媒體及同業間之三種倫理關係；（三）倫理準則屬規勸性質；（四）與運動員互動：指出應與不應表現之行為。接著指出三個國家各自獨有或獨無之處，如台灣獨有預防嚼檳榔、加強品德教育，但缺乏澳洲對受傷、生病運動員的關照。最後依研究結果提出建議供準則執行及未來修改之參考。

The disciplined ethics have been a deciding stipulation for professionalism. In order to improve the quality of professional coaches, Taiwan, there, formulated the Code of Ethics of Athletic Coaches in 2010. Through the literature review, this study analyzes the nature of the Code of Ethics of Athletic Coaches. At first, the paper will investigate the implication of the code. Second, the paper will attempt to further explore the codes of coach existing in the three countries: Taiwan, America, and Australia and, the differences of the three countries will be made in the following text. The commonly-shared features based on the inducement can be summarized as follows: 1. The position of an athletic character: the emphasis of the importance of personal morality and exercise; 2. Refer to the subjects: including coach and athlete, audience, media and interbank that relation of ethics; 3. Code of ethics is a nature of persuasion; 4. Interact with athlete: point out the behavior should express or not. After that, the distinctive differences can be shown from the three studied countries, for instance, Taiwan's prevention of areca, and the reinforcement of education in morality, but the lack of the appropriate medical care for the sick/injured athletes, a policy Australia has been implementing. In conclusion, according to the result of research several suggestions can be put forward: for executing the codes and refer for the future modification.