月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
法学家 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
唐代的請托及其法律治理困境
並列篇名
Soliciting-Help and Predicament on Harnessing Soliciting-Help in Tang Dynasty
作者 谢红星
中文摘要
請托是包括唐代在內的傳統社會的普遍現象。唐代實踐中的請托從類型上看主要有司法請托、科舉請托、銓敘請托、政治性請托;從途徑上看包括直接向主司請托、委託監臨勢要向主司請托、委託與主司關係密切之人向主司請托、委託與監臨勢要關係密切之人向主司請托;從手段上看包括以財物請托、以情色請托、空手請托。唐律對請托罪作了規定,同時追究請托人與受請托人的法律責任,但效果顯然不理想。既因實踐中請托方式的隱蔽,也因監臨勢要權勢的威懾抵消了法律制裁請托的威力,而根源在於傳統社會公權力的私化及其有效監督之缺乏。
英文摘要
Soliciting-help was common in ancient China including Tang Dynasty. Soliciting-help in Tang Dynasty happened on judiciary territory, imperial civil service examination, appointing officials and political action. Some solicited help of official-in-charge directly, others through who was powerful, or was close with official-in-charge or powerful officials. Some solicited help while giving bribes, others without bribes. Tang Code provided some crimes of soliciting-help, and penalized not the one soliciting help, but the one who accepted soliciting-help. However, the effects were unsatisfactory, because soliciting-help was covert sometimes, and the force of legal sanctions was counteracted by the power of superior officials and influential officials. Of course, the root cause was the power was privatized and not be supervised effectively in ancient China.
起訖頁 41-54
關鍵詞 請托人情社會監臨勢要公權力私化Soliciting-helpHuman SocietySuperior Officials and Influential OfficialsPower-Pri­vatized
刊名 法学家  
期數 201412 (2014:6期)
出版單位 中國人民大學
該期刊-上一篇 區域貿易安排與所得稅差別待遇的消除:現行機制與未來路徑
該期刊-下一篇 智慧財產權法院制度設計的本土化思維
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄