1020勞工團體鬧場抗議事件的分析

The Event of Interrupting a Conference by Labor Groups on October 20, 2006: An Observation and Analysis

2006年10月20日勞工團體在中正大學勞工關係學系舉辦之「勞動派遣理論與實務對話研討會」中鬧場抗議50分鐘，正在進行的研討會因而中斷。本研究採用文獻分析法及問卷調查法探討：（一）勞工團體抗議政府勞動派遣政策可以採取的作法有那些？（二）勞工團體鬧場抗議可能觸犯的法律？（三）學生對勞工團體鬧場抗議事件的感受如何？勞工團體可採用多元回應方式。服務、對話和動員三種方式因應勞動派遣政策，但是不分場合的頻頻動員，而自抗議對象為非勞工行政單位的大學，其效力有限且作法可議。勞工團體鬧場抗議可能涉及「社會秩序維護法」第64、72和73條，「刑法」第152及306條以及「民法」第184條。問卷調查結果顯示1020事件並未使受訪學生受到嚴重驚嚇，但是高達62%的學生表示不贊同勞工團體鬧場抗議的作法，而且有25.8%的學生認為勞工關係學系受到傷害。

Several labor groups interrupted an on-going conference on ”Dispatched Work” and occupied the podium for 50 minutes on October 20, 2006 at the National Chung Cheng University. The conference was held by the Department of Labor Relations of the University and sponsored by the Council of Labor Affairs. Group leaders tried to challenge the government's attitude toward the issue of dispatched work. This paper explores the action in respects of tactics, legality, and the students' feeling about it. The following findings are based on the authors' observation on the scene and the questionnaires collected from the Department's students. The labor groups may take a multiple responsive strategy, which combines serving, social dialogue and mobilisation. The action they took may violate the Criminal Act and the Social Order Maintenance Act. Most students were not frightened by the annoyance. However, 62% respondents disagreed with the action and 25.8% felt that it had a negative effect on the Department.