家庭暴力加害人與受害人家庭互動關係之實證研究

Evidence-based research on the reciprocal attitude between perpetrators and victims in family violence

基於瞭解家庭暴力加害人與受害人互動關係與情緒反應對家庭暴力起因的影響，另設計對照組，試圖與被司法界定的家暴兩造家庭互動暨情緒反應交叉比對，期能歸納出箇中線索或其他不同的想法。經研究得知：家暴組男、女樣本在教育程度、婚姻狀況及婚後衝突時間都呈現明顯的差異性；反之，對照組則無此差異性存在。就男、女性別與互動關係、情緒反應比較，家暴組在互動關係及情緒反應皆較對照組為高。如僅針對互動關係而言，無論是家暴組或對照組皆呈現出女性較男性為高。如針對情緒反應而言，家暴組中女性與男性是在伯仲之間，而對照組則是男性高於女性。探討互動關係、情緒反應及年齡分層相關分析呈現為：家暴組與對照組中年齡分層皆未與互動關係、情緒反應有顯著相關。家暴組中無論是積差相關或是控制年齡分層變項後之淨相關，皆呈現出互動關係、情緒反應為中度相關。對照組則在積差相關、淨相關統計法中，互動關係、情緒反應及年齡分層三項變項皆未達相關顯著水準。研究結果可作為提供臨床治療師，在治療前及治療中有更高的敏感度體察加害人較深層感受，俾利整體治療的事半功倍。

The research is to understand the cause-and-effect from the family’s reciprocal attitude and the feeling respond between perpetrators and victims in family violence, by designing a control group, to try to bring out the clue or a different way of thinking by the two who are justified as the directly involved in the family violence on the cross-ratio of reciprocal attitude and feeling respond. The research reveals there are quite differences from the samples of male and female of justified group in the educational level, marital status and conflict time in marriage; on the contrary, the control group, no difference exists. Comparison of male and female, reciprocal attitude, feeling respond, the justified group is higher than the control group. If only for reciprocal attitude, both groups present female is higher than male. For feeling respond, the justified group is the same with female and male, the control group is male higher than female. Discussing on the reciprocal attitude, feeling respond and layered age, the relative analysis shows: the layered age of both groups has no obvious relation with reciprocal attitude and feeling respond. The justified group has middle levelrelation with reciprocal attitude and feeling respond, no matter in Pearson product-related correlation or partial correlation of layered age variables. The control group has no relative levels in the statistics of Pearson product-related correlation and partial correlation with three variables of reciprocal attitude, feeling respond and layered age. The results of the present study might enable us to provide the clinical therapists with more sensitive empathetic understanding of the deeper feelings of the perpetrators, and the greater advantages in a holistic treatment.